Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. MALA, J
Kasilingam – Appellant
Versus
Saraswathi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges lower court's rejection of execution application. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. application under o.21 r.26 returned without numbering or hearing. (Para 3) |
| 3. maintainability decision requires judicial order per supreme court. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. directions issued to number, hear, and decide application on merits. (Para 6) |
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking to set aside the docket order dated April 8, 2026 passed in R.E.A.S.R.No.3468 of 2026 in R.E.P.No.99 of 2025 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Attur, made in O.S.No.816 of 1984 and for consequential direction to the Subordinate Judge, Attur, to take the R.E.A.S.R.No.3468 of 2026 on file and dispose the same on merits in accordance with law.
2.Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondent, notice is dispensed with to them.
3.The learned Counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the application in R.E.A.Sr.No.3468 of 2026, was filed by the revision petitioner under Order XXI Rule 26 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, in respect of “D” schedule mentioned properties in Survey No.42/3 measuring an extent of 0.12 cents and Survey No.42/9 measuring an extent of 0.37 cents. Th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
