Order

The petitioner/accused facing trial in C.C.NO.561 of 2025 challenging the order dated 10.12.2025 passed in Crl M.P.No.10755 of 2025 permitting the respondent/complainant to produce the screenshots of pictures along with section 65-B certificate.

2. The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Further at the time of Section 207 proceeding, the screenshot copies were served to the petitioner and PW1 and PW2 were examined and both of them were not stated anything about the screenshots. The screenshots are very much available in the court. But later to rectify the same, a petition has been filed to show that the screenshots are not available in the court. Whether it is available in the CD or not is not the requirement of the court. It has to be seen that whether the document is available and it is very much available. Further, there is no section 65B certification and hence, screenshots could not taken in evidence. The trial court had not considered these