Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
N.ANAND VENKATESH, K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN
D. Duraiyarasan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. circumstantial evidence requires complete guilt chain (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. jewelry recovery proof fails due contradictions (Para 8) |
| 3. extra-judicial confession unreliable and improbable (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. last seen theory not established by hearsay (Para 12) |
| 5. fingerprint evidence lacks proper foundational proof (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. murder for gain theory unproved missing theft link (Para 21) |
| 7. bloodstained clothes recovery not corroborated (Para 22) |
| 8. acquittal due prosecution failure beyond doubt (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
JUDGMENT :
K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
1. The sole accused in S.C.No.61 of 2015, on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Srivilliputhur has preferred the present appeal challenging the conviction and sentence imposed upon him under Section 450 of sentencing him to undergo 10 years Rigorous Imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs.2000/- indefault, to undergo 3 months Rigorous imprisonment and convicting him under Section 302(2 counts) of and sentencing him to undergo life imprisonment and fine of Rs.5,000/- in default, to undergo 6 months Rigorous imprisonment (2 counts) and convicting him unde
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
