Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.V.Karthikeyan, K.Kumaresh Babu, JJ
Indira Jayaraman – Appellant
Versus
R.Nagarajan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of testamentary suit and pleadings (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. single judge's findings on will proof (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. appellant's challenge to will genuineness (Para 14 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. precedents on attesting witness examination (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. respondent's defense of will proof (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 6. supreme court precedents on registered wills (Para 29 , 30) |
| 7. burden on party disputing registered will (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 8. proof of attesting witness signatures (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 9. compliance with sections 68-69 evidence act (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 10. will duly proved; appeal dismissed (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54) |
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by C.V.Karthikeyan J.)
The 2nd defendant / Indira Jayaraman in T.O.S.No.34 of 2015, aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 04.12.2024 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court, is the appellant herein.
2.The respondent, R.Nagarajan, had filed O.P.No.22 of 2015 before the Original Side of this Court under Sections 232 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 seeking Letters of Administration to be
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
