Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.Sathish Kumar, M.Jothiraman, JJ
Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust – Appellant
Versus
R.Valarmathi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of family pension denial post-husband's death despite employment. (Para 2 , 3 , 8) |
| 2. appellant argues against dual da payment citing rule 20a. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. respondent relies on g.o.ms.no.112 allowing da for employed pensioners. (Para 6) |
| 4. rule 20a inapplicable to family pensioners; g.o.ms.no.112 governs. (Para 9 , 11) |
| 5. distinguishes prior cases; allows da on family pension independently. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT :
M. JOTHIRAMAN, J.
1. Under assail is the order passed in WP.(MD)No.35410 of 2025 dated 10.12.2025.
2. The first respondent/writ petitioner has challenged the order passed by the third respondent/Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., vide his proceedings dated 13.11.2025 and consequential direction to the official respondents to revise the family pension of the writ petitioner along with dearness allowance and disburse the family pension with dearness allowance including arrears thereof with an accrued interest at the rate of 12% per annum.
3. It is the case of the first respondent/writ petitioner that her husband namely, Mr.A.Ravichandran was working as Deputy Manager in the third respondent/Transport Corporat
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
