IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.Murali Shankar, J
Balakrishna Ammal – Appellant
Versus
Seethammal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against confirmation of trial decree in property suit. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
The Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.116 of 2011 dated 21.08.2013 on the file of the Ist Additional Subordinate Court, Tiruchirappalli, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.1141 of 2004 dated 24.03.2011 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Tiruchirappalli.
2. The appellant is the first defendant. The deceased first respondent as plaintiff filed a suit as an indigent woman in O.S.No.321 of 2002 before the Subordinate Court, Tiruchirappalli (O.S.No.1141 of 2004 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Tiruchirappalli) claiming the reliefs of declaration that the suit property belongs to her and for consequential permanent injunction restraining the defendants and their men from in any manner interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property and also for setting aside the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.646 of 1997 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Tiruchirappalli as null and void and is not binding on the plaintiff.
3. Pending second appeal, the sole r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.