Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENGH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
T.V.Thamilselvi, J
Boney Kapoor – Appellant
Versus
M.C.Sivakami – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties and underlying suit details (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. defendants argue plaint rejection due to illegitimacy and limitation (Para 4) |
| 3. precedents support rejecting frivolous, time-barred plaints (Para 5) |
| 4. plaintiffs counter with property title proof and legitimacy issue (Para 6) |
| 5. trial court dismisses rejection application (Para 7) |
| 6. petitioners renew arguments on fraud and prior rejections (Para 8 , 9) |
| 7. plaintiffs lack locus standi and suppressed first marriage (Para 10 , 11) |
| 8. precedents mandate rejecting vexatious, barred suits (Para 12 , 13) |
| 9. plaint rejected as time-barred and meritless (Para 14) |
ORDER :
1. Challenging the impugned order passed in IA.No.3 of 2025 in OS.No.29 of 2025 passed by the Additional District Judge at Chengalpattu, the Revision Petitioners/defendants 1 to 3 have preferred this Civil Revision Petition.
2. Before the trial court, the respondents/plaintiffs 1 to 3 filed a suit praying for the relief of declaration to declare the sale deeds dated 19.04.1988 executed by defendants 4 to 6 along with late Nithyanantham in favour of Rajeshwari, Sree Latha and Sreedevi as null and void, to declare the release deed dated 16.12.1992 executed by
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
