Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, J
C.A. Natarajan – Appellant
Versus
State represented by The Inspector Of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural background and factual allegations regarding document forgery. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. parties' contentions regarding title disputes and civil vs criminal nature. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's legal analysis and reliance on supreme court guidelines on fir quashing. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. final order directing completion of investigation. (Para 11) |
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR registered in Crime No.9 of 2023 on the file of the 1st respondent.
2. On the complaint lodged by the 2nd respondent, the 1st respondent has registered an FIR for the offences punishable under Sections 464, 465, 468, 471, 420 and 120B of IPC, alleging that the 2nd respondent’s family owned the property comprised in S.Nos.12/403, 12/404, 12/405, Plot Nos.338, 339 & 371, to an extent of 52,800 sq.ft., situated at Panaiyur, Sholinganallur Revenue Village, Sholinganallur Taluk, Chennai District. It is alleged that the legal heirs viz., Raghuraman and Yedasammal conspired with one Sathyaraj, Natarajan and others, and with the help of other unknown accused persons, created forged and manipulated documents in their favour as if the aforesaid property has b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
