Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Shamim Ahmed, J
Meenakshi – Appellant
Versus
Jayarani – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the petition for condonation of delay and the underlying criminal revision case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court evaluates whether the lack of funds provides sufficient cause for an inordinate delay. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. discussion on judicial principles of limitation, balance of justice, and the duty to demonstrate diligence. (Para 11) |
Prayer:- This Crl.MP.No.9506 of 2026 is filed, under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 1765 days in preferring the Crl.RC.SR.No.18446 of 2026.
Prayer:- This Crl.RC.SR.No.18446 of 2026 is filed, under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), against the judgement passed in Crl.A.No.185 of 2018, passed by the III Additional District Sessions Judge, Poonamallee, dated 06.12.2021, confirming the judgement passed in CC.No.92 of 2017, dated 18.09.2018, passed by the FTC (Magistrate Level), Ambattur and convicting the Petitioner to undergo Simple Imprisonment for seven months and to pay a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- as compensation.
ORDER
1.This Crl.MP.No.9506 of 2026 is filed, under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 1765 days in preferring the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
