SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 49341

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J
Sathesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Press Registrar General of India – Respondent
W.P.(MD)No.14202 of 2026|W.M.P.(MD)No.10623 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: D.Prabhu Mukunth Arun Kumar
For the Respondents: T.Saroja, A.Rajasekaran

In cases of succession disputes concerning the registration of a periodical under the Press and Registration of Periodicals Act, 2023, the Registrar has a mandate to conduct an inquiry under Section 8, subject to the final adjudication of inheritance rights in civil courts.

Headnote:The case involves a dispute regarding the registration and publication of newspapers following the death of the registered owner. The primary legal instrument is the Press and Registration of Periodicals Act, 2023. The petitioner sought to restrain the respondents from continuing publications in the name of the deceased father, given pending civil litigation regarding the inheritance of the business. The Court found that while parties must resolve their rights through civil courts, the statutory provisions require the Registrar to manage the registration of periodicals, which cannot indefinitely hold the name of a deceased individual. The core issue was how to ensure compliance with registration requirements under Section 8 of the Act, 2023 when there is an internal dispute among legal heirs. The Court reasoned that registration must reflect the actual status of the business and that while the Registrar must facilitate the process, the ultimate management and ownership are contingent upon the outcome of ongoing civil suits. The Court emphasized that it is imperative for the Registrar to conduct an inquiry between the heirs to resolve registration discrepancies. The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to conduct an enquiry under Section 8 of the Act within two months, while clarifying that parties are bound by the outcomes of their respective civil litigations regarding the business property.

Table of Content
1. summary of facts and the nature of the dispute between legal heirs. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. statutory framework governing the registration of periodicals upon the death of an owner. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. court directions for regulatory enquiry subject to parallel civil litigation outcomes. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)

PRAYER:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, Mandamus

a) directing the 1st respondent to stop the 2nd and 3rd respondents from printing and publishing in both physical and digital platform the Tamil Daily Thina Boomi and Athirstam in all its edition i.e Chennai, Madurai, Thiruchirapalli Tirunelveli, Salem, Vellore and Coimbatore and Puducherry in the name of petitioner's late father Manimaran describing him as the owner, editor, printer and publisher forthwith

b) forbearing the 1st respondent from transfer of ownership of the title and the status as printer, publisher and editor of the Tamil Daily Thina Boomi and Athirstam in favour of the 2nd respondent or anyone claiming through the 2nd respondent in all its edition i.e., Chennai, Madurai, Thiruchirapalli, Tirunelveli, Salem, Vellore and Coimbatore and Puducherry.

ORDER

The writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the first respondent, namely, the Press Registrar General of India, to restrain the respondents 2 and 3 from printing and publishing, in both physical and digital form, the Tamil dailies 'Thina Boomi' and 'Athirstam' in various editions, in the name of the late father of the petitioner, namely, Manimaran, describing him as the owner, editor, printer and publisher. A further consequential relief is sought to forbear any transfer of ownership, title, or the status of printer, publisher and editor in respect of the said publications.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner's father was originally the owner, printer, publisher and editor of the said Tamil dailies. It is stated that he died on 14.10.2024. Even thereafter, the publications are being continued in the name of the deceased person by showing him as the publisher, despite disputes having arisen between the legal heirs. It is submitted that the petitioner, namely M.Sathesh Kumar, has filed O.S.No.50 of 2026 on the file of the District Court, Madurai, seeking partition of the properties described in the schedule thereto, which includes the business of printing and publishing the newspapers in question. It is further submitted that the second respondent, namely, M.Poongothai, the mother of the petitioner, has also instituted O.S.No.96 of 2026 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif Court, Madurai, and the same is pending adjudication. It is stated that though the petitioner had earlier given consent for transfer of ownership and change of name in favour of the mother, the said consent was subsequently withdrawn.

3. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent would submit that she has not yet received instructions and seeks time to obtain the same.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents 2 and 3 would submit that, based on the earlier consent given by the petitioner, an application had been submitted seeking effect of transfer. Since the same was rejected with a direction to file separate applications, fresh applications have already been submitted. It is further submitted that, in the interregnum, the publications are being continued in the name of the deceased proprietor.

5. I have considered the rival submissions made on either side and perused the materials available on record.

6. It is not in dispute that the publications, namely 'Thina Boomi' and 'Athirstam', are governed by the provisions of the Press and Registration of Periodicals Act, 2023 [hereinafter referred to as "the Act"]. Section 7 of the Act mandates that no periodical shall be published in India except upon registration in accordance with law. The Act also defin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top