Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Shamim Ahmed, J
Raju – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for release of vehicle seized during criminal investigation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments concerning owner's rights and impact of prolonged storage of vehicles. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's interpretation of powers under bnss for property disposal. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. final order granting release of vehicle on set conditions. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
ORDER
1. This Criminal Revision Case is filed to set aside the order dated 06.04.2026, made in Crl.MP.No.1577 of 2026, by the XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet and to return the vehicle in question and to allow the above Criminal Revision Petition.
2. The facts of the case are that the Revision Petitioner is the owner of the Four Wheeler, Toyota Innova Hycross (7S) bearing Reg.No.TN-18-BR-6445 which was seized by the Respondent Police on 28.01.2026, in Cr.No.38 of 2026 for the offence under Section 75((2) of BNS read with Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 1998 . Hence, the Revision Petitioner had filed the above petition, seeking release of the said Vehicle, before the Trial Court. By the impugned order, the Trial Court had dismissed t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
