2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 60994
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T. Asha, J
L.BALAJI SINGH – Appellant
Versus
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR – Respondent
WP No. 23923 of 2026 | WMP NO. 25987 OF 2026
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Harshavarthan.G
For the Respondents: A. Vinothraja
An employee certified as medically unfit for their primary role due to disability is entitled to permanent suitable alternative light duty under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.
Headnote:The petitioner, a Driver since 2008, was diagnosed with secondary arthritis and later psoriatic arthritis/polyarthritis affecting both hands, rendering him physically unfit for driving duties. Relying on Section 20 (4) of the Rights of persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, the petitioner sought permanent alternative light duty with pay protection and continuity of service. The primary issue was whether the petitioner, having been certified as medically unfit by the Medical Board at Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, is entitled to permanent light duty rather than temporary assignments. The court observed that the medical report clearly established the petitioner's inability to discharge driving duties. The respondents are directed to assign the petitioner suitable light duty permanently within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's medical unfitness for driving duties and request for permanent light duty. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. verification of medical unfitness through official medical board reports. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. mandate for permanent assignment of suitable light duty based on medical certification. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed for the following reliefs:-
“Directing the respondent to provide Suitable alternative light duty on permanent basis to the Petitioner in the cadre equal to the post of Driver with pay protection, continuity of service and all other attendant benefits as per Section 20 (4) of the Rights of persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.”
Brief facts:
2. The petitioner has been serving as a Driver in the respondent Corporation since 2008. In the year 2021, he was diagnosed with secondary arthritis affecting his hands. Despite his medical condition, he continued to discharge his duties as a Driver, which resulted in a deterioration of his health. Subsequently, he was diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis/polyarthritis affecting both hands, rendering him physically unfit to perform driving duties.
3. In view of his medical condition, the petitioner had submitted several representations requesting the respondent Corporation to refer him to the Medical Board for assessment of his disability and to assign him suitable light duty. As the said representations were not considered, the petitioner was constrained to file W.P. No. 37824 of 2025 before this Court. This Court by order dated dated 03.10.2025, had directed the respondent Corporation to refer the petitioner to the Medical Board within period of two weeks and to pass appropriate orders regarding assignment of light duty within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the Medical Board's opinion.
4. Pursuant to the said order, the Medical Board at Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital examined the petitioner and certified that he was suffering from polyarthritis and was medically unfit to perform the duties of a Driver. However, despite this medical report, the respondent Corporation has been assigning the petitioner only temporary light duty for short durations, instead of permanently accommodating him in a suitable light-duty post. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court.
5. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the records.
6. The Medical Report dated 11.12.2025 is extracted below as follows:-
[[IMG_1]]
[[IMG_2]]
7. A perusal of the above would clearly show that the petitioner is unable to discharge his duties as a Driver.
8. Therefore, in view of the medical report certifying that the petitioner is unfit to perform the duties of a Driver, the respondents are directed to assign the petitioner suitable light duty permanently within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
9. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
25-06-2026
Index: Yes/No
Speaking/Non-speaking order
Neutral Citation: Yes/No
SHR