SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 14339

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
G. S. AHLUWALIA, VISHAL MISHRA, JJ
Babulal Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
,Vk.Pandey,Advocate General

JUDGMENT

Per: Justice G.S. Ahluwalia By this common Judgment, Cr.A. No. 2642 of 2008 filed by Ravindra Yadav, Nathu Yadav, Indrapal Yadav, Goverdhan Pal and Ghooman Yadav and Cr.A. No. 87 of 2009 filed by Babulal shall be decided.

2. Both the appeals have been filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C., against the Judgment and Sentence dated 29-11-2008 passed by 6th Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Chhatarpur by which the appellants have been convicted and sentenced for the following offences :

S.No. Nameof AppellantOffence under SectionSentence
1Ravindra3 3 148 of IPC 323/149 of IPC (three counts) 25/149 of IPC 02/149 of IPC3 1 year R.I. 1 year R.I. years R.I. and fine of Rs.1,000/- in default 6 months R.I. Life Imprisonment and fine of Rs.1,000/- in default 6 months R.I.
2Nathu (Died during pendency of appeal)3 3 148 of IPC 323/149 of IPC (three counts) 25/149 of IPC 02/149 of IPC3 1 year R.I. 1 year R.I. years R.I. and fine of Rs.1,000/- in default 6 months R.I. Life Imprisonment and fine of Rs.1,000/- in default 6 months R.I.
3Indrapal3 3 148 of IPC 323/149 of IPC (three counts) 25/149 of IPC 02/149 of IPC3 1 year R.I. 1 year R.I. years R.I. and fine of Rs.1,000/- in default

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top