HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Amit Pathak – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER
The present petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashment of FIR registered at Crime No.80/2023 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 of IPC and the subsequent proceedings pending in Sessions Trial No.134/2023 pending before II ASJ, Ujjain.
2. Counsel for the applicant and the complainant have filed IA No.5554/2024 under Section 320(2) of Cr.P.C. for granting permission for compromise and IA No.5553/2024 under Section 320 of Cr.P.C. for compromise. Those applications were sent for verification before the Principal Registrar of this Court. A verification report has been submitted stating that the parties have entered into compromise voluntarily without any threat, inducement and coercion. They have amicably resolved their dispute.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent/state submits that the offence under section 420 of the IPC is compoundable, but offences under Section 467, 468, 471 of IPC are non-compoundable, therefore, the offence cannot be compounded under section 320 of the Cr.P.C.
4. The Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Anr. reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303 after considering the the provisions of section 320 and 482 o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.