SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
N/A, J
Smt.Meena Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Shriman Ayukt Mahodaya – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: N/A
For the Respondents: N/A

ORDER

The instant petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, has been preferred challenging the order dated 06.01.2014 passed by VI Civil Judge, Class-I, Gwalior, in Civil Suit No.27-A of 2012 whereby an application filed by the plaintiff/respondent under Order 6 Rule 17 of C.P.C. was allowed and he was permitted to carry out the necessary amendment in the suit.

2. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner/plaintiff had filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction against present respondent with regard to Shop No.22 situated at Indira Market (Topi Bazar), Lashkar, Gwalior to the effect that respondent in order to give shops on rent had published a notice in the daily newspaper “Dainik Bhaskar” dated 15.07.1999 inviting applications from public for first floor by fixing monthly rent @ Rs.2,300/- and other miscellaneous charges. The petitioner/plaintiff, relying on the said notice, had deposited Rs.25,000/- as security money through Bank Cheque bearing No.0002524, dated 20.07.1999 of Central Bank of India, Lashkar Branch, Gwalior, which was sent to the defendant by registered A.D. post on 20.07.1999 and thereafter had taken Shop No.22 on rent from the defendan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top