Back
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sanjay Dwivedi, J
Nageshwar Prasad Jaisal – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks quashing of fir based on consensual relationship. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. prosecutrix's statement reaffirms her complaint. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments presented regarding consent and misconception of fact. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. court analyzes the relationship and consent over 10 years. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. court references legal precedents on consent and false promises. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 6. court concludes the relationship does not constitute rape. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 7. court quashes fir due to lack of evidence for rape. (Para 13) |
| 8. final order quashing the fir and proceedings against the petitioner. (Para 14) |
ORDER
Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of charge sheet/Final Report filed against the petitioner by respondent No. 1 on account of registration of a criminal case vide Crime No. 54/2021 at Police Station Mahila Thana, District Katni for the offence punishable under Sections 376 , 376(2)(n) , 506 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. As per the case of the prosecution and the contents of FIR, on 26.11.2021, a written complaint was made to the police at Mahila Thana, Katni by the prosecutrix alleging therein t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
