SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 41990

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY DWIVEDI, J
Gaurav Jain – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
CRR 1807/2022



Advocates:
Ravi Shankar Patel,Advocate General

Consent obtained under a misconception of fact, such as a false promise of marriage, does not constitute valid consent under Section 375 IPC.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 376(2)(n) and 306 - Revision against framing of charge - The applicant contended that the material ingredients for framing charges under Sections 376(2)(n) and 306 were absent, and the trial court failed to apply its mind appropriately - The deceased committed suicide after the applicant allegedly refused to marry her, leading to the charge of abetment of suicide - The court found no evidence of physical relations or coercion, and the allegations were deemed insufficient to sustain the charges. (Paras 2, 10, 11)

(B) Consent and Misconception of Fact - The court emphasized that consent given under a misconception of fact, such as a false promise of marriage, does not constitute valid consent under Section 375 IPC - The distinction between a breach of promise and a false promise was highlighted, indicating that mere failure to marry does not amount to rape. (Paras 14, 15)

Facts of the case:
The applicant was accused of abetting the suicide of the deceased, who was in a relationship with him and allegedly pressured for marriage. The deceased committed suicide after the applicant refused to marry her. The trial court framed charges based on the FIR and statements from the deceased's family. (Paras 3.1, 3.2)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the trial court did not consider the lack of evidence supporting the charges and that the allegations were insufficient to establish a case under Sections 376(2)(n) and 306 IPC. (Paras 10, 11)

Issues: The main issues were whether the trial court properly assessed the evidence before framing charges and whether the allegations constituted sufficient grounds for the charges under IPC. (Paras 2, 10)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the absence of evidence supporting the allegations and the lack of material to establish the charges necessitated the quashing of the trial court's order. The court reiterated that emotional distress alone does not equate to abetment of suicide. (Paras 10, 11)

Result: The revision is allowed, and the order framing charges against the applicant is set aside.

ORDER

The applicant has filed this revision under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. assailing the order dated 20.04.2022 passed in Sessions Trial No.42/2022 by the Fifth Additional Sessions Judge, Tikamgarh, framing the charge against the applicant under Sections 376(2)(n) and 306 of the Indian Penal Code .

2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and the material placed by the prosecution before the Court at the time of framing of charge in relation to Crime No.361/21, the material ingredients for framing the charge under Sections 376(2)(n) and 306 of IPC were not available and even after considering the said material, the offence under Sections 376(2)(n) and 306 of IPC is not made out and, therefore, the impugned order, according to counsel for the applicant, is liable to be set aside as the trial Court did not apply its mind in appropriate manner so as to see that the material ingredients constituting the alleged offence were missing and as such, no case is made out against the present applicant and the charge could not have been framed.

3. To resolve the controversy involved in the matter, it is necessary to mention the brief facts of the case, which are as under:-

3.1 The policemen of Police Station Baldevgarh, District Tikamgarh registered an offence vide FIR No.361/21 on the basis of the information given by complainant Vivek Jain that the daughter of Arun Kumar Jain has committed suicide in her room by hanging herself and as such, merg intimation No.47/21, under Section 174 of Cr.P.C. got registered and thereafter, the matter was enquired.

3.2 During the course of enquiry, the police seized a Samsung mobile and a register in which the deceased had expressed her emotions. As per the material seized by the police, the deceased and present applicant, who was the resident of Sendhwa District Badwani were in affair. According to the complainant, the present applicant was creating pressure upon the deceased for getting married but later on he refused to enter into the marriage with the deceased. The said denial of marriage by the present applicant created unpleasant situation for the deceased and as such, she committed suicide. The police registered the offence presuming that the present applicant created pressure upon the deceased for committing suicide and during the course of investigation, an offence under Section 376(2)(n) was also registered in addition to Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code .

3.3 The incident occurred on 12.08.2021 and the FIR got registered on 03.10.2021. The age of the deceased was shown as 21 years and as per the postmortem report, no injury marks were seen on external or internal parts of the body and the hymen was also found intact. The statement of father of the deceased was also recorded wherein he has stated that his daughter hung herself to death on 12.08.2021. He has further stated that four years prior to the date of incident, the present applicant who was working as an Engineer came from Sendhwa to Baldeogarh and was residing in the house of one Birchandra Jain as a tenant. He has further stated that the deceased used to go to the house of the landlord of the present applicant as her friend was also residing in the said house. He has deposed that the applicant told the deceased that he will teach her English and very often the deceased used to go to the house of the present applicant to learn English and during that period only the present applicant trapped her in a false affair. According to the father of the deceased, the applicant created pressure upon the deceased to get married to him and accordingly he agreed for solemnizing the marriage according to the Hindu rites and went to the present applicant's house on 10.07.2021 to discuss about the marriage with his family members but they gave several excuses and kept postponing the marriage on the pretext of discord etc. in the family and the present applicant continued to harass the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top