Back
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Shri Vijay Kumar Shukla, J
Smt.Mangai Bai and others – Appellant
Versus
Smt.Hansi Bai alias Hasu Bai and others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts regarding the specific performance suit and parties involved. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments concerning the necessity of additional parties in the suit. (Para 4 , 10) |
| 3. court's observations on necessary parties’ definitions in specific performance actions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. distinction between necessary and proper parties in the context of the case. (Para 9 , 11) |
| 5. final ruling affirming the lower court’s judgment and dismissal of the petition. (Para 15 , 16) |
O R D E R
JABALPUR: (01/03/2018)
In the instant petition, a challenge has been made to the order dated 12-02-2018, passed by 5th Additional District Judge, Khandwa in Civil Suit No.2-A/2015, whereby the trial court has rejected the application filed by the petitioners/applicants under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code (In short CPC).
2. The brief facts adumbrated in nutshell are that respondent nos.3 to 6/plaintiffs have filed a suit for specific performance on the basis of agreement dated 17-07-1996. It is submitted by the plaintiffs that respondent No.1 Smt. Hansi Bai entered into an agreement to sale of agricultural land for consideration of Rs.60,000/-. It is submitted that entire cons
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
