Back
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
RAMKUMAR CHOUBEY, J
ASHISH SINGH SURYAVANSHI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual basis for charge framing established. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. argument regarding absence of chargeable offence discussed. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. legal standards for charge evaluation outlined. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. mark-sheet not deemed a valuable security for section 467 ipc. (Para 13) |
| 5. court's ruling on charge sustainability and directive for trial. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
O R D E R
At the outset, learned counsel for the parties submit that the case diary is available and copy of the charge-sheet has also been filed and therefore, record of the Courts below would not be required to be called for hearing the matter, which is related to framing of the charge. On the basis of the aforesaid submissions, the learned counsel for the parties are heard finally.
2. This revision petition has been filed under Section 397 read with 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity " Cr.P.C .") by the petitioner assailing the order dated 26.07.2024 passed by the learned IV Additional Sessions Judge, Sagar (M.P.) in S.T.No. 239/2023 (State of M.P. through SHO, Baheriya, District Sagar Vs. Ashish Singh and others) whereby charges have been framed under Sections
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
