Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
VISHAL DHAGAT, B. P. SHARMA, JJ
LUMESHWARI @ PINKY – Appellant
Versus
RAJESH DUBEY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appeal was filed challenging the family court's decree on grounds of adultery and procedural error. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the court upheld the family court's right to accept evidence flexibly in matrimonial disputes. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. evidence concerning photographs of adultery was deemed admissible and sufficient for the court's findings. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. the final decision confirmed the dismissal of the appeal. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
Per: Justice Vishal Dhagat
Appellant has preferred this first appeal under Section 19 of Family Courts Act , 1984 challenging the impugned judgment and decree dated 17.11.2021 passed in RCS-HM No.68/2020 (Rajesh Dubey Vs. Lumeshwari @ Pinki) by Principal Judge, Family Court, Balaghat (MP). By said judgment, Family Court allowed the petition filed by the husband (respondent herein) under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act and suit was decreed and marriage between appellant and respondent dated 13.02.2006 was dissolved.
2. Counsel appearing for the appellant attacks the impugned judgment and decree on grounds that Family Court had committed an error of law in relying the photographs which were secondary evidence and passing judgment and decree of div
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
