SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Online)(MP) 5

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
, J
Jharia N.P. v. State of M.P


Table of Content
1. conviction and potential sentence review. (Para 1 , 5 , 6)
2. legal implications of possessing disproportionate assets. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
3. assessment of assets and income discrepancies. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 15)
4. evaluation of income sources. (Para 13 , 14 , 17)
5. re-investigation and validity of prosecution sanction. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)

1. Appellant N. P. Jharia has been convicted under S.5(1)(e) read with S.5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act , 1947 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act) and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three years and to a fine of Rs. 75,000/-.

2. It is not in dispute that the appellant was appointed as Sales Tax Officer on 16-9-1975 and he was occupying that post during the check period of 16-9-1975 to 31-12-1983. He was married to Pushpa Jharia (DW1) in the year 1969 and he has three children.

3. The prosecution case is that during the period 16-9-1975 to 31-12-1983 the appellant was in possession of pecuniary resources and property worth Rs.10,19,210/- as disproportionate to his known sources of income. A detailed discussion will be made later in this judgment. After investigation the Special Police Establishment had su























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top