SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Online)(MP) 4

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
N/A, N/A
Kashmir Jat – Appellant
Versus
State of M.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant: N/A
For the Respondents: N/A

Table of Content
1. petitioner's criminal history leads to preventive detention. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments against legality of detention order examined. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court analyzes detention under national security act. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 9)
4. judgment affirms subjective satisfaction required for detention. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. final ruling dismisses the petition and discusses options. (Para 14 , 15)

1. By moving this writ petition under Art.226 of the Constitution of India, a challenge has been made to the order dated 5th April, 2012 passed by the Deputy Secretary, Home Department to the State of M.P. Bhopal under S.12 (1) of the National Security Act 1980 whereunder the order passed by the District Magistrate, Guna has been made absolute with extension of period of detention as mentioned in the order itself.

2. The facts leading to the case may be summed up as under: The Superintendent of Police Guna by his letter dated 8th February 2012 addressing to the District Magistrate, Guna informed that petitioner Kashmir Jat, son of Lalaram Jat, aged 42 years, resident of village Richora, P.S. Cant Guna had a chequered history since last 1991 and he was involved in several criminal activi





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top