SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A. ALAGIRISWAMI, I.D. DUA AND C.A. VAIDIALINGAM, JJ.
Masood Alam etc., Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others, Respondents.
Writ Petitions Nos. 469 and 470 of 1972, D/- 11-1-1973.
Constitution of India,1950 – Article 32 – Criminal Procedure Code,1973 – Section 144 - Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 – Section 3(1)(a)(i) & (ii) - General Clauses Act, 1897 – Section 21 - Detention – Detenu - In writ petition court made a short order o directing the release of one unless he was required in some other case, reserving our reasons for his release to be given later – Said one detenu-petitioner, was arrested pursuant to an order of detention - No copy of that order is produced on record - It is, however, not disputed that the said order was made by District Magistrate under Section 3 (1) (a) (i) and (ii) of Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 have been exciting communal feelings amongst Muslims and feelings of disaffection towards the Government of India and of hatred to other communities – Said one have also been advocating use of force by Muslims in India to secure withdrawal of A. M. U. (Amendment) Bill, 1971 - Whether he is likely even in the future to act in a manner prejudicial to public order– Held, According to the writ petition petitioner is an active member of Muslim Majlis and also a member of Youth Majlis - He was arrested while defying order promulgated under S. 144, Cr. P.C - This had been preceded by various prejudicial activities in the month as stated in the grounds of detention and was followed two days later by communal clashes - Instances under both these grounds are relevant and germane to object which is sought to be achieved by Section 3 of Act for purpose of detaining persons who are likely to act in a manner prejudicial to the security of State or maintenance of public order - Decisions relied upon on behalf of the petitioner reported in Dwarka Dass Bhatia v. State of J. & K. 1958 SCR 948 and Pushkar Mukherjee v. State of West Bengal (1969) 2 SCR 635 are, on facts and circumstances of this case, of no assistance to him - Writ petition accordingly fails and is dismissed - Order accordingly.
Judgment
DUA, J. :- These two petitioners under Article 32 of the Constitution for writs in the nature of habeas Corpus (Masood Alam v. Union of India and others. W. P. No. 469 of 1972 and Abdul Bari Kairanvi v. Union of India W. P. No. 470 of 1972), have been heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment.
2. Writ Petition No. 469 of 1972 :- In writ petition No. 469 of 1972 we made a short order on December 20, 1972 directing the release of Masood Alam unless he was required in some other case, reserving our reasons for his release to be given later. We now proceed to deal with the arguments advanced on his behalf and give our reasons for our decision.
3. Masood Alam, detenu-petitioner, was arrested on June 15, 1972 pursuant to an order of detention dated June 14, 1972. No copy of that order is produced on the record. It is, however, not disputed that the said order was made by the District Magistrate under Section 3 (1) (a) (i) and (ii) of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 (Act No. 26 of 1971) (hereinafter called the Act). The grounds of detention signed by the District Magistrate, Aligarh were served on the petitioner on June 17, 1972, pursuant to Section 8 of the Act. Those grounds read :-
"(1) That you have been exciting communal feelings amongst Muslims and feelings of disaffection towards the Government of India and of hatred to other communities. You have also been advocating use of force by Muslims in India to secure withdrawal of the A. M. U. (Amendment) Bill, 1971 - now an Act. These actions, which are a threat to security of the State and the maintenance of public order, find support from the following instances :-
(i) that you are organiser at Aligarh of Youth Majlis a para-military organisation which imparts training to Muslims in the use of lathi, swords and knives, etc. You are member of Al Jehad, an International Islamic movement. You are Naib Amir Ala Youth Majlis, U. P.
(ii) You went to participate in Youth Majlis training Camp at Varanasi. You were trained in the use of knife and demonstrated the same at a function of the youth Majlis held in Mohalla Tantanpara, Aligarh.
(iii) You participated in a meeting addressed by Shri Afaq Ahmad, Organiser, Youth Majlis, U. P.
(iv) On 12-7-1971 you stressed upon members of Youth Majlis to organise branches of Youth Majlis in each Mohalla. You went to Allahabad to participate in the youth Majlis Camp organised there from 23 to 26-6-71 and were made Naib Ala, U. P.
(v) You attended the meeting held at your residence on 29-10-71 wherein training programme of Youth Majlis in use of knife and aiming by air gun was discussed.
(vi) You attended a private meeting of Muslim Majlis on 11-1-1971 at the residence of Dr. Hanif Mohalla Rasalganj, Aligarh. You disclosed there that the Youth Majlis was fully prepared to meet any situation on communal basis and pleaded for funds for Youth Majlis.
2. That you have extra territorial loyalties and are, therefore, a threat to security of India which is evidenced from the following instances :
(a) You visited Pakistan and returned from there on 29-4-1971 and participated in a meeting addressed by Shri Afaq Ahmad, Organiser Youth Majlis, U. P. In this meeting you disclosed that you had developed many contracts in Pakistan and the people there had given you enough money for the help of Muslims in Aligarh.
(b) You on 16-7-1971 along with Abdul Bari Qairanvi and Mohammad Obes were noticed criticising Government of India s policy towards Bangala Desh and accused Government of India and Indian press of carrying on a false propaganda.
(c) You attended a meeting on 29-10-1971 held at your residence wherein Abdul Bari Qairanvi asked the volunteers to remain vigilant and prepared in view of Indo-Pak armies facing each other to meet the situation which might result therefrom......." The Government, it appears, did not accord its approval of the petitioner s detention as required by Section 3 (3) of the Act. According to para 22 of the w
relied upon : Ujjagar Singh v. State of Punjab
applicable : Dwarka Dass Bhatia v. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Rameshwar Sham v. District Magistrate Burdivan
distinguished : Makhan Singh Tarsikka v. State of Punjab
relied upon : Sahib Kingh DuggaL v Union of India
distinguished : Sampat Prakash v. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Pushkar Mukherjee v. State of West Bengal
M. M. Salim Khan v. C. C. Base
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.