Back
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
, J
Chhaila Shukla – Appellant
Versus
Ranjeet Kumar Kori – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal status and facts of complaint registered. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments for and against the bail application. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. identification of judicial obligations on bail applications. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's assessment of the special judge's findings. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. final ruling on anticipatory bail granted. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
1. The accused - appellant has filed this appeal under Section S.14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short "the Act") against the impugned order dated 12.01.2017 passed by the Special Judge (Atrocities) Panna in Bail Application No.52/2017, whereby the learned Special Judge dismissed an application filed by the accused - appellant under S.438 of the Cr.P.C.
2. The brief facts of the prosecution case for adjudication of this appeal are that on 13.12.2016 at about 7:48 p.m. complainant - respondent No.2 Ranjeet Kumar Kori made an oral FIR at Police Station Shahnagar of Panna district stating that on the self - same day at about 5:30 p.m., he and his wife were standing nearby the house of one Mama Panda situated in village Devri. At that time, accused - appel
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
