Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Not Mentioned, J
Mubarak Ali @ Bhura – Appellant
Versus
Nausad Ali – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. election petition challenges the election result based on compliance with legal procedural rules. (Para 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. debate centers on the mandatory deposit of security as per election rules. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. emphasis on strict compliance with procedural rules for validity in election petitions. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. final verdict upholding the dismissal of the revision petition. (Para 17) |
1. With the consent of both the parties, the matter is heard finally.
2. The instant Civil Revision petition is filed under the provisions of S.26(2) of M.P. Municipalities Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') challenging the order dated 05.04.2018 passed by the 1st Additional District Judge to the Court of 1st Additional District Judge, Satna (M.P.) in Election Revision No.1/2015 (Mubarak Ali @ Bhura V. Nausad Ali & Ors) whereby the learned Election Tribunal has allowed the Election Petition filed by the respondent no.1 and set - aside the election of the petitioner on the post of Councillor of Ward No. 13 (Badi Chiphati) Nagar Parishad Uchehra, District Satna and as a consequence thereof the respondent no.1 has been declared elected as Counci
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
