Back
MADHYA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPAL
*A. K. Tiwari (Presiding Member), Dr. Srikant Pandey, D. K. Shrivastava (Members)
Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Rakesh Kumar Singhal
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing requirements for consumer disputes. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. rights to present evidence in consumer forum. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. mandatory timelines under consumer protection act. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. district commission's powers and limitations. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. judgment on merits of the application. (Para 15 , 16) |
1. The petitioners / opposite parties have filed this revision petition against the order dated 24.4.2019 passed in C.C.No. 202/2016 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Morena (For short 'District Commission') whereby their application dated 7.12.2018 for taking affidavit and documents on record, was dismissed by the District Commission.
2. The facts relevant for disposal of this revision are that after service of notice dated 12.1.2017 of complaint, the petitioners / opposite parties first time appeared through Counsel on 15.2.2017 but did not file any reply. They filed reply to the complaint on 9.3.2017, i.e. beyond a period of 45 days. However, the District Commission vide order dated 2.11.2018 allowed their belated reply to be taken on record subject to payment of cost of Rs.1,000 to the complainant / respondent. There
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
