SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9317

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Judge, J
Manoj Gupta v. Sharma Advertising Through Proprietor Dhirendra Sharma
Miscellaneous Petition | COM No.04 of 2020 | Regular Civil Suit No.4 - B of 2015



Procedural violations do not impede justice if they do not cause prejudice, allowing for additional documents under specific circumstances.

Headnote:The petitioner challenges the Commercial Court's orders allowing the plaintiff to submit additional documents post-filing of the plaint, which contravenes established procedural rules under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The Court emphasizes that justice delivery should not be obstructed by procedural missteps if no prejudice is demonstrated to the defendant. The legality of admitting new documents in light of adherence to procedural rules and the implications of the plaintiff's procedural violations are concluded.

Table of Content
1. overview of procedural history of civil suit and application for document inclusion. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments concerning the application for document production and procedural compliance. (Para 3 , 4)
3. judicial observations on procedural integrity and the precedence of substantial justice. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. court's reasoning on the procedural rules governing the admission of documents. (Para 8)
5. final decision affirming previous court orders. (Para 13)

1. This Miscellaneous Petition under Art.227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by petitioner - defendant against order dated 7th of February, 2024 as well as subsequent order dated 21-10-2024 passed by Sixth Civil Judge, Class - I, Gwalior (in short '' the Commercial Court'') in COM No.04 of 2020 (arising out of original Regular Civil Suit No.4 - B of 2015) whereby application filed by respondent - plaintiff under S.151 of CPC (IA No.01 of 2023, dated 21-02 - 2023) for taking documents (three bills) on record, which could not be exhibited at the time of filing of plaint, has been allowed as well as subsequent application filed by plaintiff under O.7, R.14 of CPC seeking production of bills and paper publications has been allowed.

2. Necessary facts for disposal of present petition, in short, are respondent - plaintiff (Firm) filed a civil suit before the Civil Judge, Class - I, Gwalior on 28 of August, 2015, seeking recovery of money of Rs.55,33,021/- along - with interest and cost of litigation, pleading therein that respondent is an Advertising Agency, through which petitioner - defendant had got certain advertisements published in Newspapers and he did not make payment of entire amount due to the plaintiff as charges in regard to advertisements.

In reply, defendant filed his WS and denied plaint averments. It was pleaded that he had paid entire amount due and plaintiff had forged the Bills for advertisements which were not even published in newspapers. An application under O.11, R.12 of CPC was filed by him on 05-02-2016 and the same was allowed by the Civil Court vide order dated 08-03-2016, with a direction to plaintiff to file an affidavit.
In pursuance thereof, plaintiff submitted an affidavit in the shape of application under O.11, R.13 of CPC. In counter, defendant filed an application under O.11, R.21 read with S.151 of CPC on 11-02-2020 seeking dismissal of suit. Plaintiff filed its affidavit under O.11, R.12 of CPC on 19-02-2020.

Vide order dated 19-10-2020, the instant suit filed on behalf of plaintiff was transferred by the Civil Court to the Commercial Court in exercise of powers vested under S.15 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 , whereby the instant transferred suit was subsequently renumbered as COMM No.04 of 2020. Plaintiff filed an application on 21-02-2023 under S.151 of CPC before the Commercial Court, seeking permission to get the bills exhibited in evidence, pleading that bills pertaining to the advertisements published in newspapers between 15th of March, 2014 and 17th of September, 2014 could not be produced on account of bona fide mistake and the bill dated 31-01-2014 could not be placed by it on record at the time of filing of plaint.

In reply, on 16th of June, 2023 defendant filed his reply to the application filed by plaintiff under S.151 of CPC, inter alia alleging that the copies of forged bills were sought to be brought on record by plaintiff in order to harass him and the application is not supported by any affidavit, therefore, the same deserves to be rejected.

The Commercial Court allowed application of plaintiff under S.151 of CPC vide order dated 7th of February, 2024. Therefore, defendant is before this Court.

3. It is contended on behalf of petitioner - defendant that it was necessary for plaintiff to produce all documents on which plaintiff relied in plaint averements within thirty days from the date on which, the instant civil suit was transferred to Commercial Court. The Commercial Court has exce


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top