SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9817

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Virendra Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Raghvendra Dixit,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND SINGH BAHRAWAT th ON THE 26 OF NOVEMBER, 2025 WRIT PETITION No. 6502 of 2020 VIRENDRA KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Rajbahadur Singh Tomar – learned counsel for petitioner.

Shri Prabhat Pateriya – Deputy Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER

This petition, under Article 226 of Constitution of India, has been filed seeking the following relief (s):

“i- That, the impugned order (Ann. P/1 and P/2) may kindly be quashed.

ii- That, respondents may kindly be directed to retain the petitioner at proper place in his seniority, when he would have been placed at the time of his regular promotion, as there would not have been any punishment order/enquiry, with all consequential benefits.

iii- That, other relief which may deem fit may also be granted.”

2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner was holding the post of Additional Collector but since 4.10.2012 to 5.4.2014 petitioner was on deputation in Mandi Board holding the post of Deputy Director. At the relevant point of time, when petitioner was posted as Deputy Director in Madhya Pradesh State Ag

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top