SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9853

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
A.M.S.K.Group Th.Prop.Arjun Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Goven.Of M.P. & Ors – Respondent


Advocates:
,Pn Dubey(1 To 3),Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA &

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRADEEP MITTAL

th

ON THE 19 OF NOVEMBER, 2025 CIVIL REVISION No. 67 of 2004 A.M.S.K.GROUP TH.PROP.ARJUN KUMAR Versus STATE GOVEN.OF M.P. & ORS Appearance:

Shri Manoj Kumar Sanghi - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Piyush Jain G.A. for respondents/State.

ORDER Per: Justice Pradeep Mittal This Civil Revision under Section 19 of the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 is directed against the award dated 30/10/2003 passed by the Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal, Bhopal, in Reference Case No. 25/1996, whereby the claim of the petitioner has been rejected.

2. The undisputed facts reveal that the work of construction of Mahi Subsidiary spill way including balance excavation of approach & spill channel was awarded by Irrigation department to the applicant under Agreement No. 2/1987-88. The contract value was Rs. 154.5 lakhs /-. The work order was issued on 1/2/1988 and the stipulated time for completion was 24 month except rainy season from the work order, with the scheduled completion date falling on 31/10/90 but work continued up to 31/5/1990, Dispute arose between

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top