SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 269

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Kamlesh Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Prashant Sharma[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHISH SHROTI

WRIT PETITION No. 45491 of 2025

KAMLESH KUMAR GUPTA

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Mr. Prashant Sharma - Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Praveen Kumar Newaskar – Deputy Solicitor General for the

respondents.

ORDER

Reserved on : 16.12.2025 Delivered on : 05.01.2026

ORDER

The petitioner has invoked Article 226 of Constitution of India challenging

the order dated 08.11.2025 (Annexure P/1) by Additional Director of respondent no.3 Institute thereby terminating his service in terms of Clause vii of his order of

appointment dated 11.10.2013.

2. The respondents have filed the return wherein a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of writ petition against the respondent no.3 Institute, which is a self-financed educational private institute, has been raised and vehemently argued by their learned counsel. The arguments are accordingly heard

on preliminary objection as also on merits.

3. The learned counsel for respondents argued that respondent no.3- Rustamji Institute of Technology (RJIT), is an Engineering College established by Society run by Boarder Security Force with an object t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top