SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 273

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Anurag Bansal – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Aditya Joshi,Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE

th

ON THE 5 OF JANUARY, 2026

MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 46850 of 2025

ANURAG BANSAL

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Anupam Verma - Advocate for petitioner.

Ms Kalpana Parmar - Public Prosecutor for respondent/State.

Shri Mahendra Kumar Sharma - Advocate for respondent [COMP].

ORDER complaint/FIR in the respective Courts, as per the guidelines set out by the Hon'ble Apex court;

This petition under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed by the petitioner

seeking following reliefs:-

(i) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction that all the FIRS registered in any police station in Madhya Pradesh, relating to non- payment of maturity of depositors, be clubbed and proceeded with before the jurisdictional Special Court which is competent to try the FIR No. 273 dated 31.07.2025 registered at Police Station Palera, District-Tikamgarh, Madhya Pradesh, by treating this FIR as Principal

FIR, as per the procedure laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court;

or

issue an appropriate writ, order or direction that all the FIRs registered in the police station of District Ashok Nagar & Vidisha, Madhya Prade

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top