Amanat Ali vs State of Karnataka - 2023 Supreme(SC) 1213

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(SC) 1213

B. R. GAVAI, ARAVIND KUMAR
Amanat Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Chandra Prakash, AOR Mr. Vivek Singh, Adv. Mr. C.p. Rajwar, Adv. Ms. Somi Sharma, Adv. Mr. Binay Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Lav Kumar Agarwal, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. D. L. Chidananda, AOR Mr. Yashraj Singh Bundela, AOR Mr. Pawan, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Verma, Adv. Mr. Gopal Jha, AOR Ms. Pallavi Langar, AOR

JUDGMENT :

Aravind Kumar, J.

1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for the following relief:

“Consolidate/Club all the FIRs (i) FIR No. 324/2017, 406/420/120 (B) IPC and 4/6(1)/6(2) M.P. Act, Dewas, M.P., (ii) FIR No. 479/2018, 420/34 IPC, Indore, M.P., (iii) FIR No. 283/2020, 420/34 IPC, Khargone M.P., (iv) FIR No. 002/2021, 420 IPC, Gokul Road, Hubali, Karnataka, (v) FIR No. 090/2021, 406/420/120(B) IPC, Dhadhara, Gumla, Jharkhand registered against the Petitioner in different states at various police stations to the Court of the competent jurisdiction at Guna, Madhya Pradesh where proceedings are pending in the FIR No. 0266/2018, U/S420/407/418/406/409120B/467/468. Section 4/6(1)/6(2) MP investors Interests Act 2000, P.S. Guna Kotwali, District: Guna in the interest of justice.”

2. We have heard Mr. Chandra Prakash, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Yashraj Singh Bundela, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.2 and Ms. Pragya Baghel, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.3.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(SC) 1213

B. R. GAVAI, ARAVIND KUMARAmanat Ali – AppellantVersusState of Karnataka – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

B. R. GAVAI, ARAVIND KUMAR
Amanat Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent