SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 11197

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sikandar Singh Parihar – Appellant
Versus
State Of M.P – Respondent


Advocates:
D.S.Raghuvanshi,Ajay Bhargava,Rajeev Upaddhyay,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND SINGH BAHRAWAT

th

ON THE 19 OF DECEMBER, 2025

WRIT PETITION No. 3358 of 2012

SIKANDAR SINGH PARIHAR

Versus

STATE OF M.P AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri D.S.Raghuvanshi - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri M.S.Jadon-Govt. Advocate for the respondents/State.

ORDER impugned show cause notice/order dated 02-05-2012. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that ex-parte enquiry has been conducted by the authority behind the back of the petitioner and petitioner has mentioned in his reply that all work has been completed and despite several requests made by the petitioner as well Gram Panchayat, the measurement has not been done, by the Engineers. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in aforesaid respect, the petitioner also written representation to the CEO, Janpath Panchayat. Despite the request made by the petitioner, the engineer was not interested to verify measurement of the work which has been completed by the Gram Panchayat and on the basis of ex-party inquiry, the amount of recovery from Sarpanch and Secretary Rs. 50,01,750/- and Rs. 33,43,120/-, respectively ascertained by the respondents behind the b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top