Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
Pavan Kumar Dwivedi, J
M/S. PREMCO RAIL ENGINEERING LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INDORE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's analysis on the interpretation of 'court' in section 29a. (Para 4 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 3. arguments regarding jurisdiction under section 29a. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. final decision to extend the arbitration proceeding time. (Para 21 , 22) |
ORDER
This application has been filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for brevity "Act of 1996") by the claimant for extension of time for conclusion of arbitration proceedings.
2. The relevant facts of the case are that the applicant is a private company incorporated under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at Kolkata. It is engaged in the business of construction for railways and other governmental organizations, civil works related thereto and other various tenders throughout India.
3. The respondent is an educational institution and one of the sixth IITs which were established in the academic year of 2008-2009. Earlier, vide an order dated 08.09.2023, this Court appointed sole arbitrator by invoking provisions of Section 11 of the Act of 1996 on an application filed by t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
