SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2422

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Au Small Finance Bank Mr. Dinesh Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Smt Ramdevi Rajpoot – Respondent


Advocates:
Mallikarjun Khare[P-1],

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN

th

ON THE 5 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 CIVIL REVISION No. 1190 of 2025 AU SMALL FINANCE BANK MR. DINESH PANDEY Versus SMT RAMDEVI RAJPOOT AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Mallikarjun Khare - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Saket Agrawal-Advocate for the respondent No. 1.

Shri Sushil Kumar Jha- Advocate for the respondent No. 2.

ORDER The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated

01.08.2025 passed by the trial court, thereby rejecting the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC filed by the petitioner Bank who is defendant No. 1 before the trial court.

2. The necessary facts for the purpose of disposal of the present petition are that the defendant No. 2 had mortgaged the suit property in favour of the bank on 24-07-2019 while getting the loan from the bank. However, the same property was thereafter sold to the plaintiff on 23.03.2023 and thereafter the plaintiff on the strength of sale deed has filed a suit against the bank and the dependent no. 2 who is the vendor, stating that the plaintiff be declared title holder of the suit property/house and also that the defendant No. 1 i.e. the bank should no

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top