SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 4431

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ekta Agarwal (Goyal ) – Appellant
Versus
The Jiwaji University – Respondent
WP 48069/2025



Advocates:
Alok Kumar Sharma[P-1],

##PAGE1##

1 W.P.Nos.26738/2025, 20234/2025, 18551/2025,

48057/2025, 48062/2025 & 48069/2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND PATHAK

&

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND SINGH BAHRAWAT

WRIT PETITION No. 26738 of 2025

LATE SURENDRA PRATAP SHIKSHA SAMITI AND OTHERS

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri M.P.S.Raghuvanshi – Senior Advocate with Shri Mohd. Amir Khan - Advocate

for the petitioners.

Shri Ankur Mody – Additional Advocate General for the respondents No.1 and 2/

State.

Shri Rahul Yadav – Advocate for respondents No.3 and 4.

WRIT PETITION No. 20234 of 2025

VIDHYASUDHA WELFARE FOUNDATION SAMITI GWALIOR

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri R.B.S.Tomar - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Ankur Mody – Additional Advocate General for the respondents No.1 and 2/

State.

Shri Rahul Yadav – Advocate for respondents No.3 and 4.

WRIT PETITION No. 18551 of 2025

SMT. SHYAMA DEVI DEEN DAYAL BAHUDHESHIYA PRACHAR

PRASAR SAMITI GWALIOR AND OTHERS

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri R.B.S.Tomar - Advocate for the petitioners.

Shri Ankur Mody – Additional Advocate General for the respondents No.1 and 2/

State.

Shri Rahul Yadav – Advocate for respondents No.3 and 4.

Signature Not Verified

Signed by: SANJEEV

KUMAR PHANSE

Signing time: 2/5/2026

1:28:15 PM

##PAGE2##

2 W.P.Nos.26738/2025, 20234/2025, 18551/2025,

48057/2025, 48062/2025 & 48069/2025

WRIT PETITION No. 48057 of 2025

VIKASH JATAV AND OTHERS

Versus

THE JIWAJI UNIVERSITY AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Alok Kumar Sharma – Advocate for the petitioners.

Shri Tapan Kumar Trivedi – Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2.

WRIT PETITION No. 48062 of 2025

GIRRAJ NAGAR AND OTHERS

Versus

THE JIWAJI UNIVERSITY AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Alok Kumar Sharma – Advocate for the petitioners.

Shri Tapan Kumar Trivedi – Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2.

&

WRIT PETITION No. 48069 of 2025

EKTA AGARWAL (GOYAL ) AND OTHERS

Versus

THE JIWAJI UNIVERSITY AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Alok Kumar Sharma – Advocate for the petitioners.

Shri Tapan Kumar Trivedi – Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2.

ORDER

(Passed on this 4th day of February 2026)

Per: Justice Anand Pathak

Regard being had to the similitude of the issue involved, all the

petitions were heard analogously and decided by this common order. For

convenience's sake, facts of Writ Petition No.26738/2025 are taken into

Signature Not Verified

Signed by: SANJEEV

KUMAR PHANSE

Signing time: 2/5/2026

1:28:15 PM

##PAGE3##

3 W.P.Nos.26738/2025, 20234/2025, 18551/2025,

48057/2025, 48062/2025 & 48069/2025

consideration.

2. The present petition (Writ Petition No.26738/2025) under Article 226

of the Constitution is preferred by the petitioners seeking following reliefs:

(i) That, the impugned order dated 02.07.2025

(Annexure P/1) and proceedings dated 05.05.2025

(Annexure P/2) and 09.05.2025 (Annexure P/3) be

directed to be quashed.

(ii) That, respondent University be directed to

recommend for inclusion of name of petitioner

institutes for participation in the ongoing

counseling for B.Ed. course for the academic

session 2025-26 on their sanctioned seats/intake

in accordance with their order of recognition

granted by the NCTE. Accordingly, the State

Government may be directed to permit the

petitioner institute to participate in the ongoing

counseling and to grant the admission in

accordance with law.

(iii) That, other relief which is just and proper in the

facts and circumstances of the case may also be

granted.

3. It is the grievance of the petitioners that vide impugned order

dt.02.07.2025, the affiliation of the petitioners institution of B.Ed. Course for

the academic session 2025-26 has been put on hold on the basis of registration

of criminal case so also recommendation of the Standing Committee

dt.05.05.2025.

4. It is the submission of learned senior counsel for the petitioners that

recognition has already been granted to the petitioners' institution by NCTE

for running B.Ed. course vide recognition order dt.31.01.2017. Thereafter,

Signature Not Verified

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top