Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
Jai Kumar Pillai, J
BHERUGIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. compassionate appointment after father's death; non-disclosure of acquitted case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5) |
| 2. violation of natural justice; acquittal pre-termination; lenient view for class-iv. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. suppression disentitles employment; acted per condition on adverse verification. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. compassionate as exception for immediate relief; strict rules inapplicable. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. policy permits post-appointment termination only on reasoned unfitness assessment. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. orders quashed; reconsider appointment per observations. (Para 18 , 19) |
ORDER
1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is preferred by the petitioner challenging the communication dated 02/06/2018, the termination order dated 22/06/2018, and the subsequent communications dated 18/04/2019. By these impugned orders, the respondents have declared the petitioner unfit for government service and terminated his compassionate appointment. The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to quash the said orders and direct the respondents to reinstate him on the post of Peon with all consequential benefits.
Facts of the Case
2. The petitioner’s father,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
