Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
Jai Kumar Pillai, J
Virendra Kumar Katare – Appellant
Versus
General Administration Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges delayed charge sheet for 2013 quasi-judicial acts. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. protection under judges act; no charges without mala fides; delay vitiates. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. respondents allege misconduct, corruption overriding quasi-judicial shield. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. quasi-judicial actions protected unless corruption or recklessness proven. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. vague charges, delay justify quashing absent impropriety evidence. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 6. charge sheet quashed; review dpc directed. (Para 28) |
ORDER
1. This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner, being aggrieved by the charge sheet dated 25.06.2019 (Annexure P/1) issued by Respondent No. 2. By way of the impugned charge sheet, the petitioner has been subjected to disciplinary proceedings for a cause of action pertaining to the year 2013.
2. The petitioner seeks the indulgence of this Court to quash the impugned charge sheet and all consequential proceedings, declaring the same as void ab-initio. The petitioner further prays for a direction to the respondents to conduct a review
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
