Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
AVM J. RAJENDRA, MEMBER, MR. SUBHASH CHANDRA, PRESIDING MEMBER
Sakshi Otwani – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Academy of Medical Sciences Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner attempted to secure scholarship through exam. (Para 3) |
| 2. opponents claimed no jurisdiction or cause of action. (Para 4) |
| 3. detailed arguments presented by both sides. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court found no merit in petitioner's claims. (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT
AVM J. RAJENDRA, AVSM VSM (Retd.), MEMBER
1. This Revision Petition is filed under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (“the Act”), against the Order dated 06.06.2017 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chhattisgarh (“State Commission”) in First Appeal No.242 of 2017. In the impugned order dated 06.06.2017 the State Commission dismissed the appeal against the order passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Chhattisgarh (“District Forum”) in Complaint No.472 of 2016 dated 15.03.2017, wherein the learned District Forum dismissed the complaint of the Complainant.
2. For the convenience, the parties are referred to as placed in the original Complaint filed before the District Forum.
3. Brief facts of the case, as per the complainant are that, she is a second-year MBBS student at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, and aspired to pursue a postgraduate
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
