Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
AVM J. RAJENDRA AVSM VSM (Retd), PRESIDING MEMBER, MR. ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, MEMBER
M. Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
K. Rajasekhar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner filed for refund due to non-delivery of land as per agreement. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. issues of consumer status and liability were contested based on transaction intent. (Para 10 , 15) |
| 3. court analyzed agreement to determine roles and responsibilities of parties. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. the ruling set clear distinctions of consumer rights and responsibilities under the cpa. (Para 14 , 16) |
| 5. final ruling dismissed the petition, stressing joint liability for non-compliance. (Para 17 , 18) |
JUDGMENT
Air Vice Marshal J. Rajendra AVSM VSM (Retd)
1. This Revision Petition has been filed under Section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (the “Act”) against the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Hyderabad (State Commission) Order dated 21.08.2017 in FA No. 1016/2013 which allowed the Appeal of the Complainant and set aside the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I at Hyderabad („District Forum‟) order dated 28.03.2013 in C.C. No. 79/2012.
2. As per Registry, there is 100 days delay in filing this Revision Petition. For reasons stated in IA/5984/2018, the delay is condoned.
3. For convenience, the parties are referred to as placed in the or
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
