NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
A.P. Sahi, President, Bharatkumar Pandya, Member
Rickers Estate Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Macrotech Developer Limited – Respondent
ORDER
1. The present complaint has been instituted urging that the complainant had acquired a residential unit from the opposite party, the cost of the unit being Rs.13,16,15,460/-. As against the aforesaid price a sum of Rs.3,00,00,000/- is stated .to have been transferred to M/s. Shreeniwas Cotton Mills. The opposite party has stepped into its shoes after merger with the opposite party. The allegations in the complaint are that according to the agreed schedule, despite regular requests, the opposite party did not enter into any agreement to sell and a letter was written on 02.05.2017, requesting the opposite party to intimate about the exact date of constructions and also execute the agreement to sell. However, this indifferent attitude continued and therefore the complainant made a request on 05.08.2020 to cancel the booking. A complaint was earlier filed before the Rera Authority seeking refund of the entire amount, where a totally incorrect reply was filed by the opposite party. The Rera Authority refused to entertain the claim and passed orders on 28.06.2023, a copy whereof has been filed as annexure 7.
2. It is in this background that the present complaint has been filed for t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.