ORDER

DR. INDER JIT SINGH, PRESIDING MEMBER

1. The present Consumer Complaint (CC) has been filed by the Complainant against the Opposite Party as detailed above, with the following prayers:

"(a) To hold and declare the Opposite Party Developer to be guilty of deficiency in service as per the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act , 1986.

(b) To direct the Opposite Party developer to pay to the Complainant the sum of Rs.99,48,679/- (Rupees Ninety Nine Lakhs, Forty Eight Thousand Six Hundred and Seventy Nine) being the compensation for deficient carpet area as . per clause no. 9 of the tripartite alternate permanent accommodation agreement and the joint measurement taken by M/s. Harshad K. D., MCGM Licensed Architects Engineers with OP.

(c) To direct the Opposite Party Developer to hand over to the complainant Society 19 visitors' parking space as per the MCGM approved plans within a time bound schedule as decided by this Hon'bie Commission.

(d) To direct the Opposite Party Developer to complete the pending, incomplete and deficient works as per the report of M/s. Harshad K. D., the MCGM licensed Architects Engineers within a time bound schedule as decided by this Hon’bie Commission.

(