NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Inderjit Singh, President, Sudhir Kumar Jain, Member
Jaya Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Ireo Grace Realtech Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complainant's booking and context of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. contentions regarding licensing and default. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations about forfeiture and agreement terms. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. final judgement and directions. (Para 11) |
ORDER
D R .IN D E R J IT S IN G H , P R E S ID IN G M E M B E R
1. The present Consumer Complaint (CC) has been filed under Section 21 (a) (i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the Complainant against the Opposite Parties - 1 to 5 as detailed above, iFnEteDrC aBliaA praying for directions to OPs:-
(i). To refund of the amount of Rs.62,95,330/-(Principal Amount) along with Rs.43,00,583/- i.e. interest @18% from the date of deposit upto 30.06.2017 along with future and pendent lite interest @18% per annum to the date of payment.
ii. to pay an amount of Rs. 25,00,000/- for damages towards mental agony, harassment, and Rs.2.5 lakh towards cost of litigation.
2. Original Complaint had 6 Opposite Parties. Notice was issued to OP - 1 to 5 only on 29.08.2017, holding that OP-6 is not a necessary party to the complaint.
3. It is averred/stated in the Complaint that:-
i)That the complainant booked a flat on 22.03.2013 in t

Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.