Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
A. P. Sahi, President, Bharatkumar Pandya, Member
Kamla Devi – Appellant
Versus
New India Assurance Company Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background regarding the timeline of delay and the reasons provided for it. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. summary of arguments and reliance on precedents regarding condonation of delay. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's refusal to condone inordinate delay lacking cogent explanation. (Para 9) |
ORDER
A. P. SAHI, J (PRESIDENT)
1. This Appeal has been presented with a reported delay of 1434 days whereas the Appellant claims that the delay is only 1263 days.
2. The Complainant had filed Consumer Complaint No. 14 of 2009 before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh. The same has been dismissed for want of prosecution after 12 years of pendency on 18.11.2021 by the State Commission against which the present Appeal has been filed. The reason prayed for condoning the delay in the filing of the Appeal has been stated in Paragraph No. - 3 of the Application being IA No. 15159 of 2025 which is as follows:
"3. That the impugned judgment and order passed by the Hon'ble State Commission on 18.11.2021, and it is pertinent to note that the free certified copy of the impugned judgment and order dated 18.11.2021 was never received by the Appellant. Thus, a pai
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
