SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 643

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Ashok Bhushan, J
ACROW REALCON PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
UNION BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
IA Nos.2936-2939 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Krishnendu Dutta
For the Respondents: Himanshu Satija

For limitation purposes under Section 61 IBC, e-filing an appeal at 9:00 PM is within the same 'day', which ends at midnight. Procedural rules of a High Court cannot curtail the statutory period of limitation.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 61(2) - Companies Act, 2013 - Section 469 - National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules, 2016 - Rules 22, 103, 104 - Limitation for filing appeal - Condonation of delay - E-filing after working hours - Meaning of 'day' - The 45th day after the impugned order, the appeal was e-filed at 9:00 PM, and the Respondent argued that under Delhi High Court E-filing Rules, Rule 14.2, filing after 1600 hours should be treated as filing on the next working day, making it beyond the condonable period of 15 days. The Court held that the NCLAT's own order dated 24.12.2022, issued under Rules 103 and 104, provides that limitation is computed from the date of e-filing. The word 'day' means a period of 24 hours beginning at midnight, as defined in law and affirmed by the Supreme Court in Raj Kumar Yadav vs. Samir Kumar Mahaseth and Ors. (2005) 3 SCC 601. The statutory period of limitation cannot be curtailed by rules of procedure framed by a High Court. Therefore, e-filing at 9:00 PM on the 30th day was within the same day, and the appeal was not barred by limitation. (Paras 1-21)

(B) Limitation - Condonation of delay - Section 61(2) of the IBC allows a maximum condonation of 15 days beyond the 30-day period. The court found sufficient cause for the delay of 15 days, as explained in the application (examination of voluminous judgment, obtaining approvals, coordination among multiple appellants, etc.). The delay was held to be condonable. (Paras 25-26)

Facts of the case:
The impugned order was passed by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) on 13.02.2026. The appeals were e-filed on 30.03.2026 at 9:00 PM, which was the 45th day after the order (30 days + 15 days condonable period). The Respondent Union Bank of India objected to the condonation, arguing that the e-filing after 1600 hours should be treated as filing on 31.03.2026, thus making the appeal beyond the 15-day condonable period.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the appeals were filed within the condonable period of 15 days (by 9:00 PM on the 45th day) and that the delay was sufficiently explained. The applications for condonation of delay were allowed.

Issues: Whether an appeal e-filed after the working hours of the NCLAT (9:00 PM) can be treated as filed on the same day for the purpose of limitation? Whether the Delhi High Court E-filing Rules (Rule 14.2) apply to the NCLAT? Whether the delay of 15 days was sufficiently explained?

Ratio Decidendi: The word 'day' means a period of 24 hours beginning at midnight; therefore, e-filing at 9:00 PM is still within the same day. The statutory period of limitation under Section 61 of the IBC cannot be curtailed by procedural rules of a High Court. The NCLAT's own Rules and orders (dated 24.12.2022) govern e-filing, and limitation is computed from the date of e-filing. The delay of 15 days was sufficiently explained.

Result: Applications for condonation of delay allowed. Appeals listed for hearing on 10.07.2026.

Table of Content
1. delay condonation application and parties' submissions. (Para 1 , 2)
2. nclat rules 22, 103, 104 and order dated 24.12.2022 on e-filing limitation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. respondent's argument on delhi high court e-filing rules and its inapplicability to nclat. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. meaning of 'day' and reliance on raj kumar yadav and sanket kumar agarwal. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
5. sufficient cause for delay and condonation. (Para 25 , 26 , 27)

Ashok Bhushan, J.

1.These applications have been filed praying for condonation of 15 days’ delay in filing the Appeals. The order impugned was passed on 13.02.2026 by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) Division Bench, Court-I, Ahmedabad Bench. Aggrieved by the order, these Appeals have been e-filed on 30.03.2026. The Appeals having been filed on 45th day after passing of the impugned order, prayer has been made to condone the delay of 15 days which is within condonable period. Reply has been filed by Respondent No.1 objecting to the condonation of delay. In the reply, it is pleaded that the present Appeals have been e-filed after the court working hour around 9 P.M. on 30.03.2026. It is submitted that filing affected by Appellant at 9 P.M. on 30.03.2026 cannot be treated as filing on 30.03.2026 itself. Relying on the Rule 14.2 of the Delhi High Court Electronic Filing Rules, it is pleaded that online e-filing carried out after 1600 hours on any day is to be treated as filing on the next working day. It is pleaded that the present Appeals thus, has to be held to be filed on 31.03.2026 which is beyond condonable period of 15 days. Respondent prays that the application for condonation of delay need to be rejected Appeals having been filed beyond condonable period.

2. We have heard Shri Krishnendu Dutta, Learned Senior Counsel for the Applicant/ Appellant and Shri Himanshu Satija, Learned Counsel appearing for the Union Bank of India.

3. Filing of an Appeal in NCLAT is governed by NCLAT Rules 2016 framed by the Central Government in exercise of power conferred by Section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013. Rule 22 of the NCLAT Rules provide ‘presentation of appeal’ which is as follows:-

“22. Presentation of appeal.- (1) Every appeal shall be presented in Form NCLAT-1 in triplicate by the appellant or petitioner or applicant or respondent, as the case may be, in person or by his duly authorised representative duly appointed in this behalf in the prescribed form with stipulated fee at the filing counter and non-compliance of this may constitute a valid ground to refuse to entertain the same.

(2) Every appeal shall be accompanied by a certified copy of the impugned order.

(3) All documents filed in the Appellate Tribunal shall be accompanied by an index in triplicate containing their details and the amount of fee paid thereon.

(4) Sufficient number of copies of the appeal or petition or application shall also be filed for service on the opposite party as prescribed.

(5) In the pending matters, all other applications shall be presented after serving copies thereof in advance on the opposite side or his advocate or authorised representative.

(6) The processing fee prescribed by the rules, with required number of envelopes of sufficient size and notice forms as prescribed shall be filled along with memorandum of appeal.”

4. Rule 103 deals with ‘filling through electronic media’. Rule 104 deals with ‘removal of difficulties and issue of directions’. Rules 103 and 104 of the NCLAT Rules, 2016 are as follows:-

“103. Filling through electronic media. The Appellate Tribunal may allow filing of appeal or proceedings through electronic mode such as online filing and provide for rectification of defects by e-mail or internet and in such filing, these rules shall be adopted as nearly as possible on and form a date to be notified separately and the Central Government may issue instructions in this behalf from time to time. 104.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top