SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 1321

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Labh Singh, Judicial Member, Rekha Kantilal Shah, Technical Member
Tuticorin Electricity Supply Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Bhuvan Madan, Resolution Professional of Hiranmaye Energy Limited – Respondent
C.P.(IB) No. 138/(KB)/2021 | I.A. (IB) No. 896/KB/2024



Advocates:
For the Applicant: Mr. Shaunak Mitra, Adv., Mr. Akash Dutta, Adv.
For CoC: Mr. Saurav Panda, Adv., Ms. Mohana Nijhawan, Adv., Mr. Deepanjan Dutta Ray, Adv., Ms. Sanjana Jha, Adv., Ms. Snigdha Saraff, Adv.
For the RP: Ms. Manju Bhuteria, Sr. Adv., Mr. Madhav Kanoria, Adv., Ms. Srideepa Bhattacharya, Adv., Ms. Rituparna Chatterjee, Adv., Ms. Arundhati Burman Roy, Adv.

Fully compulsorily convertible debentures without repayment obligation, interest, or time value of money are equity instruments, not financial debt under IBC Section 5(8), based on subscription agreement terms and intent.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 60(5), 5(7), 5(8), 3(6), 3(11) - Fully and Compulsorily Convertible Debentures (FCCDs) - Nature - FCCDs issued as 0% instruments, compulsorily convertible into equity shares upon occurrence of specified events (COD, material event, or permitted tenure), without interest, repayment obligation, or stipulation to become financial debt - Classified as equity in balance sheet and agreements to alter shareholding pattern - Do not satisfy financial debt definition under Section 5(8) lacking time value of money consideration - Treated as equity instruments, not debt. (Paras 7.1 to 7.20)

(B) Compulsorily Convertible Debentures - Determination of character - Examine terms of subscription agreement: (i) no repayment liability; (ii) no interest; (iii) compulsory conversion; (iv) no provision for debt character on event; (v) intent as equity infusion for shareholding - Balance sheet classification and party intentions confirmatory. (Paras 7.7 to 7.16)

Facts of the case:
Financial creditor initiated CIRP admitted on 02.01.2024. Applicant claimed as financial creditor for amount towards FCCDs originally subscribed by third party, allegedly purchased via intermediaries but not registered/transferred in records. RP rejected claim verifying no disbursement by applicant, records showing original holder, and FCCDs as equity. Applicant challenged rejection under Section 60(5).

Findings of Court:
FCCDs constitute equity, not debt; claim lacks basis as no financial debt exists even if transferred; rejection by RP justified.

Issues: (i) Whether FCCDs amount to debt? (ii) Whether applicant entitled to claim on records? (iii) Whether RP's rejection justified?

Ratio Decidendi: Court analysed subscription agreement clauses, balance sheet, and precedents; held FCCDs as equity due to compulsory conversion sans repayment/interest, intended for shareholding change; RP correctly rejected unverified claim not reflecting financial debt.

Result: Application dismissed.

Table of Content
1. cirp initiation and claim submission background. (Para 1 , 2)
2. application dismissed; claim rejected. (Para 8)

ORDER

Per: Rekha Kantilal Shah, Member (Technical)

1. The present application has been preferred by Tuticorin Electricity Supply Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as “TESPL”) under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “IBC”) praying for the following reliefs:-

“a. Mandatory order be passed directing the resolution professional to accept and restore the claim of the applicant herein;.

b. An order be passed setting aside the decision of the Respondent contained in his email dated 28th March, 2024, being Annexure “P-9” hereto.

c. Pending the hearing of the present application, the Respondent be restrained from giving effect to and/or further effect to the email dated 28th March, 2024 and taking any further steps in the instant CIRP proceedings.

d. Ad interim orders in terms of prayers above.

e. Such further or other orders be passed and/or direction or directions be given as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper.”

2. BACKGROUND OF THE CASE

2.1 The Corporate Debtor is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the business of power generation. REC Limited, a financial creditor of the Corporate Debtor filed an application for initiation of a corporate insolvency resolution process (“CIRP”) of the Corporate Debtor under Section 7 of IBC before this Hon'ble Tribunal (“Insolvency Petition”). Accordingly, the Corporate Debtor was admitted into CIRP vide order of the Hon’ble Tribunal dated 02nd January 2024.

2.2 Pursuant to the admission of the Insolvency Petition, the IRP took over the management and business affairs of the Corporate Debtor on a going concern basis to carry out the functions as mentioned in the IBC the rules and regulations made thereunder.

2.3 The public announcements as required under Section 13(2) of the IBC read with Regulation 6 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulation, 2016 were made by the IRP on 04th January, 2024. Pursuant to the public announcement the applicant filed its claim before IRP, which forms the basis of the dispute in the instant application.

3. SUBMISSIONS BY THE APPLICANT

3.1 It has been submitted that the CD entered into an “Fully and Compulsory Convertibles Debentures Subscription agreement” 1, Annexure P1. dated 24th June, 2015, with Indian Power Corporation Limited (“IPCL”). In terms of the agreement, IPCL infused a sum of Rs.500 Crores in the CD against subscription of 49,04,60,660/- of the FCCDs of the CD.

3.2 Thereafter, the IPCL entered into an “Securities Purchase Agreement”, P3 dated 30th March 2017, for selling the 49,04,60,660/- number of FCCDs, to Power Trust. Subsequently, the applicant entered into an advance agreement, P4 dated 1st April 2017, with Power Trust for the purpose of purchasing the said FCCDs against the advance for a sum of Rs 306.00 cr.

3.3 Subsequently, in terms of the order dated 2nd January 2024, the said Resolution Professional made a public announcement on 4th January 2024 in Form-A inviting claims from the creditors of the Corporate Debtor. The Applicant herein stating itself to be a Financial Creditor of the Corporate Debtor submitted its claim for an amount of Rs 1847,32,39,950/- in the prescribed Form-C.

3.4 In the interregnum, the Power Trust vide a letter dated 9 January 2024, intimated to the applicant that due to the pending approval from the lenders of the corporate debtor, the securities could not be transferred and accordingly requested the applicant, to claim the advance amount which was lent out for the purchase of securities of the corporate debtor, directly from the corporate Debtor.

3.5 Pursuant to the claim submitted by the applicant, the respondent vide its e-mail dated 26th January 2024, informed the applicant that the claim of the applicant for Rs. 1847,32,39,950/- towar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top