SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 1695

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Rajeev Bhardwaj, Judicial Member, Sanjay Puri, Technical Member
Subhendu Mohanty – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Gupta – Respondent
IA (IBC)/1276/2025 in CP (IB) No.296/7/HDB/2018|CP (IB) No. 296/07/HDB/2018



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Rakshitha, Ms. B. Sapna Reddy
For the Respondents: Ms. Ritika Gaur, Ms. Shalya Agarwal

Only claims existing on liquidation commencement date, filed within stipulated time, are admissible; post-liquidation assessments during moratorium invalid without approval, rejecting delayed additional claims.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Sections 33(5), 38, 42, 60(5), 238 - IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 - Regulations 12, 16, 17, 18 - NCLT Rules, 2016 - Rules 11, 49, 112 - Liquidation process - Admissibility of claims - Only claims existing as on liquidation commencement date admissible; must be submitted within time specified in public announcement - Claims arising post-liquidation commencement from assessment orders issued thereafter not entertainable - Moratorium under Section 33(5) prohibits institution/continuation of proceedings including quasi-judicial assessments without prior approval - Application seeking condonation of 2030 days delay in filing additional claim and direction to admit it dismissed as time-barred and substantive claims non-existent on LCD. (Paras 31, 32)

(B) Limitation - Condonation of delay - IBC timelines strict, not extendable by equity; sufficient cause must be shown with diligence - Delay of over 2000 days without justification not condonable, preserving time-bound framework and finality in liquidation. (Paras 14, 15, 32)

(C) Jurisdiction - Challenge to Liquidator’s rejection of claim - Governed exclusively by Section 42 (14-day appeal); not maintainable under Section 60(5). (Para 13)

Facts of the case:
Liquidation commenced on 27.11.2019 with claims deadline 29.12.2019. Initial claim based on assessment order dated 10.05.2019 admitted. Additional claim of Rs.55,89,16,735 submitted on 16.06.2025 based on post-liquidation assessment order dated 12.06.2025 and corrigendum dated 11.06.2025 correcting earlier order, rejected by Liquidator on 25.06.2025 as post-LCD. Application filed seeking condonation of 2030 days delay and admission of claim.

Findings of Court:
Revised claim arose post-liquidation commencement, inadmissible; no steps taken by applicant to pursue earlier; Liquidator’s rejection proper.

Issues: Maintainability under Section 60(5) vs. Section 42; condonability of 2030 days delay; admissibility of post-LCD claims from assessments during moratorium.

Ratio Decidendi: Claims must exist on LCD and be filed timely; post-LCD assessments void under moratorium without approval; strict timelines ensure finality, no equity to override IBC framework.

Result: Application dismissed.

Table of Content
1. factual background of customs claim rejection post-liquidation (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 17 , 29 , 30)
2. applicant's plea for condonation of delay and claim admission (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. maintainability and time-bar under sections 42, 60(5) (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
4. post-lcd claims inadmissible due to moratorium and timelines (Para 16 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
5. ibc overrides inconsistent laws; strict timeline adherence (Para 22 , 23 , 24)
6. no sufficient cause for condoning 2030-day delay (Para 25 , 26 , 27)
7. only pre-lcd claims admissible; application dismissed (Para 28 , 31 , 32 , 33)

ORDER

1. This Application has been filed by Shri Subhendu Mohanty, Assistant Commissioner, Paradeep Customs Division, against Sri Sanjay Gupta Liquidator of LANCO Babandh Power Limited, the Corporate Debtor, under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and Rules 11 and 49 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016, seeking the following prayers.

I. The Hon’ble Tribunal may be pleased to condone the delay of 2030 days in filing the claims before the Respondent Liquidator.

II. The Hon’ble Tribunal may be pleased to direct the Respondent Liquidator for Lanco Babandh Power Limited (Corporate Debtor) to verify and admit the claims of the present Applicant.

APPLICATION

2. The Applicant, Shri Subhendu Mohanty, Assistant Commissioner of the Customs (Preventive) Commissionerate, Bhubaneswar, under the Ministry of Finance, Government of India, has submitted this application in his official capacity. It is further stated that the Government of India, through the Ministry of Finance, is the jurisdictional assessing authority for the Respondent company, Lanco Babandh Power Limited, which is presently under liquidation before the National Company Law Tribunal.

3. According to the Applicant, after lodging a claim of Rs. 3,46,43,38,610 before the Liquidator on 23.12.2019, the books and accounts of the Paradeep Customs Division were audited by officers of the Accountant General (Audit) Odisha during January 2025. It is stated that the audit titled “Performance Audit on Project Import’’ found that six manually filed and provisionally assessed Bills of Entry were never considered for finalization. The audit also noted that, upon examining forty-two finally assessed Bills of Entry, the assessable values in three of them were incorrectly determined under Final Assessment Order No. VIII-CUS-48(26) Proj. Cont. Regn/PDP/2011/3570-74 dated 10.05.2019.

4. Pursuant to the audit, all manually filed Bills of Entry of the Corporate Debtor for F.Y. 2011-12 and 2012-13 were taken up for final assessment. Final Assessment Order No. VIII-CUS-48(26) Proj. Cont. Regn/PDP/2011/Pt.-1/5185 dated 12.06.2025 was passed, creating a fresh Customs duty demand of Rs. 48,93,38,926. A subsequent corrigendum dated 11.06.2025 to the earlier Final Assessment Order dated 10.05.2019 corrected a typographical error in three Bills of Entry (Nos. 9682070, 9682072, 2429188), resulting in an additional demand of Rs. 6,95,77,809.

5. The Applicant states that the details of the additional demand of Customs duty against the Corporate Debtor have been provided as follows.

6. Accordingly, the total additional Customs duty claimed by the Applicant amounts to Rs. 55,89,16,735, which is sought to be recovered by the Customs Department as statutory dues from the Corporate Debtor.

7. The Applicant states that the claim was submitted to the Liquidator through Form B dated 16.06.2025 for the pending dues of the Department; however, the Liquidator rejected the application vide email dated 25.06.2025 by assigning the stated reason.

“As per Regulation 16 of the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016, claims are required to be submitted as on the liquidation commencement date. It is settled that no claims arising post the liquidation commencement can be admitted. The Corrigendum and Assessment Orders in question are dated after 27.11.2019, and thus, any demand arising there

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top