Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
Arun Kumar Tyagi, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Om Pal – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants allege illegal sand mining violations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. joint committee inspections reveal no illegal mining. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. tribunal restrains mining; supreme court intervenes. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. violations found; mining halted post-ec expiry. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. lease exceeds ec validity; responses filed. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. environmental compensation recovery delays addressed. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81) |
| 7. parties argue compliance and violations. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 8. court reviews reports, notes deficiencies. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 9. non-compliance with ec/cto conditions confirmed. (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 10. authorities' negligence and contradictions highlighted. (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 11. sand mining requires cte/cto; monitoring mandated. (Para 63 , 64 , 65 , 66) |
| 12. lease/cto must align with ec validity. (Para 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73) |
| 13. ongoing penalties and pending litigations noted. (Para 74 , 75 , 76 , 77) |
| 14. landowners entitled to mining compensation. (Para 82 , 83 |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
