Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
Arun Kumar Tyagi, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Om Pal – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants allege illegal sand mining violations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. joint committee investigates site; finds deficiencies. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. second inspection confirms past violations, closure. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. ngt restrains mining; sc allows conditional resumption. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. non-compliance leads to renewed mining ban. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 6. authorities claim no cte/cto needed for sand mining. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. pending ec renewal; compensation recovery delays. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 8. parties argue over violations and stay vacation. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 9. court reviews reports, notes joint committee lapses. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 10. procedural history of restraints and compliances. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 11. status report reveals ec/cto non-compliance. (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 12. csr and green cover conditions violated. (Para 55 , 56) |
| 13. systemic failures by authorities identified. (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61) |
| 14. sand mining requires cte/cto; monitoring mandated. (Para 62 , 63 , 64 , 65) |
| 15. lease/ec must be co-terminous; invalid extensions. (Para 66 , 67 , 68 , |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
