SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 3892

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CHENNAI (SOUTHERN ZONE BENCH)
Smt. PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J, Dr. VIJAY KULKARNI, ACJ
M. Venkata Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
Original Application No.136 of 2023(SZ) | I.A. Nos.149 & 150 of 2024(SZ)



Advocates:
For the Applicant(s): Mr. Shivang Singh, Mrs. Mamatha Ralla
For the Respondent(s): Ms. E. Niveditha, Mrs. H. Yasmeen Ali, Mr. G.M. Syed Nurullah Sheriff, Mr. K.S. Viswanathan, Mrs. T. Hemalatha

Duty to conduct Environmental Impact Assessments and obtain Environmental Clearances upheld, but project activities deemed exempt under specific regulations.

Headnote:(A) Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006, Item 8(b) - The applicant raised concerns regarding the unapproved construction of the ‘Manair Riverfront Project’ without prior EIA and EC, believed to cause environmental damage and affect structural integrity. The Tribunal observed that the project met necessary criteria and determined that no prior EC was needed based on area specifications. (Paras 1-26)

(B) Frivolous Litigation - The Applicant later withdrew his plea, acknowledging the present government's commitment to environmental safeguards, leading the Tribunal to dismiss the application, impose costs, and emphasize the need for accountability against frivolous claims. (Paras 27-35)

Facts of the case:
The applicant alleged unauthorized environmental impacts from the Manair Riverfront Project initiated by multiple state authorities without requisite clearances.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal determined that the project's activities did not require prior Environmental Clearance as per the applicable laws, thus allowing the project to proceed.

Issues: The primary issue addressed was the legality of the Manair Riverfront Project concerning environmental assessments required under the EIA Notification, 2006.

Ratio Decidendi: The Tribunal affirmed that despite allegations, evidence did not substantiate environmental harm from the project, justifying the decision not to necessitate an EIA at this point.

Result: The Original Application is dismissed with costs for filing a frivolous application.

Table of Content
1. concerns raised regarding environmental regulations for the manair riverfront project. (Para 1 , 21)
2. assessment concluded on project requirements for eia and legal clearance. (Para 15 , 16 , 22 , 23 , 24)
3. applicant's withdrawal of the case and ruling on frivolous claims. (Para 27 , 28 , 35)

JUDGEMENT

1. The present Original Application is filed by the applicant, a resident of Karimnagar, raising concerns regarding irregularities in the development and construction of the ‘Manair Riverfront Project’ at Karimnagar, Telangana, without conducting an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Study and not obtaining Environmental Clearance (EC) from the appropriate authorities.

2. The project was initiated by Respondent No.4 - Telangana State Tourism Development Corporation Limited and Respondent No.6 - Irrigation Department, on the Manair River, adjacent to the Lower Manair Dam (LMD).

3. It is alleged by the applicant that authorities are engaging in large-scale activities, including blasting within the river, without proper environmental safeguards, thereby causing potential damage to the river ecosystem. Blasting near an irrigation dam poses a severe risk due to high vibrations that may lead to structural damage, cracks, or even a dam failure, resulting in disastrous consequences. The blasting activities are contributing to air and noise pollution, adversely affecting the residents of Karimnagar. The ecosystem of the Manair River is being negatively impacted by these activities, which are occurring alarmingly close to the Lower Manair Dam.

4. It is further alleged that the riverfront project includes the construction of a check dam, flood banks, recreational spaces, open-air theatres, tourist attractions, and a boating area. Large- scale construction activities are being carried out using heavy equipment and vehicles, exacerbating environmental degradation. The Manair Riverfront Project falls under the category of ‘Area Development Projects’ as per the EIA Notification, 2006 (Category B) and requires prior Environmental Clearance.

5. Hence, the applicant filed this Original Application seeking the following reliefs:-

“a. Direct the project proponent to execute the Maneru River Front Project only after conducting Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) studies and after obtaining appropriate Environment and other clearances from TSEIAA/ Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change and Telangana State Pollution Control Board.

b. Direct the Project Proponent and Respondents of Telangana not to construct permanent structures on floodplains, within river contrary to the guidelines of MoEF and Union Ministry of Housing and Urban Development.

c. Direct the regulatory agencies to assess the damage caused to the Maneru river and its surroundings by the project proponent.

d. Direct the Official Respondents to restore the damaged area.”

6. Considering the gravity of the issue raised, this Tribunal admitted the matter and issued notice to respondents through the Tribunal as well as privately. Upon notice, the respondents entered appearance through their counsel and filed their respective pleadings.

7. The Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) / Respondent No.2 has filed a counter affidavit dated 16.10.2024, stating that the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification issued by the MoEF&CC regulates the construction of new projects or expansion/modernization of existing ones, requiring prior Environmental Clearance (EC) under sub-section (3) of Section 3 of the said Act.

8. The counter affidavit states that with reference to the applicant’s allegations, the MoEF&CC conducted a site inspection through its Hyderabad Regional Office on 17.05.2024, with officials from the Telangana Irrigation and Tourism Departments in attendance. They made detailed observations and conclusions from the inspection. The further contention of the MoEF&CC is that projects exceeding 50 Hectares fall under Category B of Ite

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top